Sexual criminal law tightened: Spain: Clear consent for sex required

Sexual offenses law tightened
Spain: Clear consent required for sex

The Spanish parliament passes the new law “Only yes means yes”. Any sex without express consent is classified as rape. “Intimidating” compliments and the distribution of sex videos are also punishable.

In Spain, sex criminal law is being tightened. A draft law by the left-wing government, according to which all persons involved must in future expressly agree to sexual acts, was finally approved by the parliament in Madrid. The MPs of the conservative People’s Party (PP) and the right-wing populist Vox voted against the so-called “Only yes means yes” law. Her main argument: the plan jeopardizes the principle of the presumption of innocence. The bill was first approved by Parliament in May, but the Senate returned it with a small amendment.

The new paragraphs remove the distinction between abuse and aggression. Once it comes into force, sexual assault will be considered rape – regardless of whether the victim resists or allows an act to happen out of fear. Up to 15 years in prison will then be available for rape and sexual violence. In addition, among other things, “intimidating” compliments and the distribution of sex videos are punishable.

Gender Equality Minister Irene Montero has described the law as a “decisive step in changing her country’s sexual culture.” The “culture of rape” and “sexual terror” will be put to an end. “The feminist movement is making history in Spain,” she said in May. With its initiative, the left-wing government reacted to several sensational cases of gang rape in which the perpetrators had gotten away with light sentences in recent years.

A case in July 2016 in particular caused great outrage. A group of five young men dragged a young woman into a doorway during the San Fermín celebrations in Pamplona. They raped their victim multiple times and filmed the whole thing. The competent court did not consider the offense of rape to be given because, as the 2018 judgment said, there had been “neither beatings nor threats” and the victim had remained passive. The verdict sparked protests across the country.

source site