Art show: Documenta curators blame themselves and Germany

art show
Documenta curators blame themselves and Germany

The “documenta fifteen” was accompanied by allegations of anti-Semitism. photo

© Uwe Zucchi/dpa

After the anti-Semitism scandal at the documenta, the curators from Indonesia speak of cultural misunderstandings. Her accusation towards Germany: “No one really listens here.”

According to the documenta, the Indonesian curatorial collective Ruangrupa underestimated the importance of the Kassel art show for the German public. “In Indonesia nobody cares much about us. The documenta, on the other hand, is almost an affair of state. We should have realized this magnitude earlier,” Ruangrupa members Reza Afisina and Farid Rakun told the Berlin “Tagesspiegel”.

“For us, the first allegations of anti-Semitism came unexpectedly in January. We never thought it would escalate like this,” the two explained in the interview. When politics and the media got involved, “a new dynamic” emerged. “From this we learned that we have to explain better what we do.” The “documenta fifteen” (own spelling; i.e. 15th documenta since 1955) has been accompanied by accusations of anti-Semitism for months. Several works were criticized as anti-Jewish.

Curators complain about the lack of dialogue

There are also cultural misunderstandings, Afisina and Rakun said. In Indonesia there has long been a lack of access to information from outside. “Some call us naive, ignorant or insensitive, but we have to work through our own trauma,” said Afisina. You’re constantly learning that that should be the “quality” of documenta fifteen, “that it’s not a closed exhibition, but something can still change everywhere”.

Works by the artist group Taring Padi were among the exhibits rated as anti-Semitic at the documenta.

“When the allegations came up, we didn’t understand why no one spoke to us directly, why there was no dialogue,” said Afisina. “In Indonesia, unlike in Germany, there is still no proper vocabulary for articulating what an anti-Semitic motive is.” And: “It was only through the debate that we understood how sensitive the topic of anti-Semitism is in Germany.”

Afisina explained why the collective only commented on the allegations of anti-Semitism quite late: “After the first incident with Taring Padi, we first had talks. We just don’t understand that it’s not enough here if we publicly admit this mistake and We apologize in particular to the people in Kassel with whom we feel connected. We call out a mistake, classify it and then carry on. Nobody really listens here, even though it’s about dialogue for us – that’s right the theme of documenta fifteen. There is no desire to understand each other.”

“Different attitudes” to the BDS movement

Regarding the anti-Israel BDS boycott movement, Farid Rakun said that Ruangrupa had “various attitudes towards BDS as well as towards Indonesian politics”. “I myself would only boycott if there was no other way. I’m not a fan of this strategy, but I understand that BDS is a possible method of protesting peacefully but audibly.”

The collective is “not a uniform monolith,” Rakun emphasized. “That’s why we, as artistic directors, don’t ask the invited artists about political, religious or other affiliations in advance. Participation in the documenta is based on shared values ​​such as independence, transparency, frugality, sustainability.”

When asked whether the collective would curate another major exhibition, Afisina said they missed not being able to participate artistically themselves in Kassel, since they are actually all artists themselves. “Nevertheless, we have a good time.” Afisina also said – according to the “Tagesspiegel” with a laugh: “We would like to take part in the next documenta.”

dpa

source site-8