The order of doctors seized against two senator doctors for having voted to abolish state medical aid

” data-script=”https://static.lefigaro.fr/widget-video/short-ttl/video/index.js” >

The practitioners who filed a complaint believe that by voting to end the AME, the two LR senator doctors are entering into “a contradiction with the oath taken by doctors “to protect all people, without any discrimination””.

Two practitioners filed complaints on Friday, November 10 before theDoctor’s orders for violation of the Public Health Code against two LR senators, also professional doctors, who voted to abolish state medical aid (AME).

The Senate adopted on Tuesday an amendment tabled by LR senators providing for the abolition of the AME, a system which fully covers the health costs of foreigners in an irregular situation present in France for at least three months, and transformed it into “emergency medical aid» during the examination of the immigration bill. The text must now be examined by the National Assembly. Among the right and center senators who voted for the reform are around fifteen professional caregivers, doctors, pharmacists and nurses.

We denounce, with numerous associations and health professionals, the complicity of Ms. Marie Mercier, senator, and Mr. Jean-François Rapin, senator, members of an assembly whose decisions directly harm physical and psychological health of a population known to be particularly vulnerable», Write in their complaints doctors Georges Yoram Federmann, psychiatrist based in Strasbourg, and Jean Doubovetzky, general practitioner practicing in Albi.

Vote for the abolition of the AME, a “contradiction with the oath taken by doctors”

The complaints are addressed respectively to the presidents of the Departmental Council of the Order of Physicians of Saône-et-Loire, where Marie Mercier practices, and Pas-de-Calais, where Jean-François Rapin is based.

According to the plaintiffs, the two targeted senators, by voting to end the AME, violated five articles of the Public Health Code, including article R.4127-7 which states that “the doctor must listen, examine, advise or treat with the same conscience all people whatever their origin, their morals and their family situation, their membership or non-membership of a specific ethnic group, nation or religion, their disability or their state of health, their reputation or the feelings he may have towards them. He must provide his assistance in all circumstances“.

Voting for the suppression of the AME is in “contradiction with the oath taken by doctors to protect all people, without any discrimination, if they are weakened, vulnerable or threatened in their integrity or dignity”, further assert in their complaint Dr. Federmann and Doubovetzky.

According to them, replacing AME with emergency medical aid “represents an unprecedented setback for rights and public health in France“. The Federation of Public Hospitals had already estimated on Wednesday that the abolition of the AME was “a heresy“.

” data-script=”https://static.lefigaro.fr/widget-video/short-ttl/video/index.js” >

source site