Panel discussion: Pro-Palestinian disruptive action: HU President shamed

Panel discussion
Pro-Palestinian disruptive action: HU president shamed

The Humboldt University: An incident occurred here during a panel discussion on the topic of “Constitutional Challenges – Judging in a Constitutional Democracy”. photo

© Jens Kalaene/dpa-Zentralbild/dpa

Because of the “shouting” of activists, the event with an Israeli judge had to be stopped. Representatives of the Humboldt University and the Hertie School find clear words.

After canceling one During a panel discussion with an Israeli judge, representatives from Berlin’s Humboldt University and the Hertie School criticized the behavior of the pro-Palestinian activists.

“I find it shameful for the guests we invited to an important discussion that it could not take place as planned,” said Julia von Blumenthal, President of Humboldt University, according to a statement. At the university, “extremely controversial positions should also be able to be discussed.” But that only works if we listen to each other. “There was no willingness on the part of the activists to do that today.”

The incident

According to a joint statement from the two universities, pro-Palestinian activists disrupted a panel discussion on the topic of “Constitutional Challenges – Judging in a Constitutional Democracy” so massively that it had to be canceled. International active and former judges were invited to the event, including Daphne Barak-Erez, professor and judge at the Israeli Constitutional Court.

According to the university, one person stood up during the event to read a statement. When the speakers on stage wanted to respond, they were disturbed “by loud and continuous shouting from individual people.” The organizers then decided to cancel the panel discussion.

“Science thrives on dialogue and exchange. We must also offer this space at universities in order to discuss competing opinions,” explained Cornelia Woll, President of the Hertie School, according to the joint statement. If discussions can only take place in closed rooms under high security conditions, it would lead not only science but also democracy into a dead end.

dpa

source site-3