Murder in the Tiergarten in Berlin: court wants to announce politically sensitive verdict

Court proclamation
The verdict in the “Tiergarten Murder” trial could trigger a political crisis with Russia

A Berlin police officer secures the crime scene after the murder in the Kleiner Tiergarten

© Christoph Soeder / DPA

A man is shot in the middle of Berlin. For more than a year, judges have tried to clarify the background – now their verdict is pending. This could put a further strain on German-Russian relations.

The verdict in the so-called zoo murder trial is awaited with great excitement on Wednesday. For more than a year, the judges tried to clear up the background to the shooting of a Georgian of Chechen descent in August 2019 in the middle of Berlin. The Federal Prosecutor’s Office is assuming an order from Russian government agencies and has applied for life imprisonment. The Berlin Court of Justice wants to give its verdict at 11 a.m. This could have serious political consequences and give the new federal government a diplomatic crisis.

Public prosecutor’s office: false identity for contract killing in the zoo

The accused is a 56-year-old Russian who is said to have traveled to Berlin with a bogus identity. He is said to have shot the 40-year-old Georgian in the Kleiner Tiergarten park on August 23, 2019. The man killed, who had been living as an asylum seeker in Germany since the end of 2016, had been classified as a terrorist by Russian authorities.

The federal prosecutor sees this as the motive for the killing. The man was seen as an enemy of the state in particular because he fought against Russia in the Chechnya war. The accused is an officer of the Russian domestic secret service FSB and has been given a false identity for the contract killing. The Federal Prosecutor’s Office sees the murder characteristics of maliciousness and low motives fulfilled and requested that the particular gravity of the guilt be determined, which almost excludes a release from prison after 15 years.

The defense does not see any conclusive evidence for the version of the Federal Prosecutor’s Office. It is based in part on “highly questionable evidence,” said defense attorney Robert Unger. This applies to the identity of the accused, but also to the connection to the Russian state assumed by the Federal Prosecutor’s Office. At the beginning of the trial, the accused himself had declared through his lawyers that his name was Vadim S., 50 years old and a civil engineer. The man denied ties to the Russian state.

Judgment tricky for German-Russian relations

If the court follows the arguments of the Federal Prosecutor’s Office, the ruling could further strain German-Russian relations. The Federal Government had already drawn the first conclusions after the Federal Prosecutor started the investigation and accused the Russian government of a lack of cooperation. Two employees of the Russian embassy in Berlin were therefore expelled.

At a press conference in Paris, Russian President Vladimir Putin called the murdered Georgian, who is said to have fought on the side of the separatists in the Russian republic of Chechnya, a “bandit” and a “murderer”. These statements had shown that the Georgian who had been killed was viewed as a terrorist “up to the highest levels of government”, the Federal Prosecutor said in its plea.

les
DPA

source site-1