After the vote on article 2 of the text repealing the pension reform, Clémentine Autain denounces “an incredible denial of democracy”
Article 2 of the bill to repeal the pension reform was adopted by the Social Affairs Committee in great confusion.
“The amendment has been adopted, rejected, uh adopted”, launched the president of the commission, after the vote on this provision which relies on tobacco taxes to finance pensions before a major social conference.
What arouse the ire of La France insoumise.
“What is happening is amazing! It is unheard of. It is an incredible denial of democracy. Understand our anger”, launched the deputy Clémentine Autain.
“But where are we?” Mathilde Panot angry after deletion of sub-amendments during committee debates
The examination of the text on the repeal of the pension reform continues, after the rejection of the article aboregant the retirement at 64 years.
To speed up the debates, Fadila Khattabi, the president of the Social Affairs Committee, decided to delete the 1000 sub-amendments tabled by Nupes.
“You refuse us the right to amendments. But where are we?”, annoyed Mathilde Panot, the boss of the group La France insoumise.
‘They wanted a vote, they got it’: budget rapporteur welcomes rejection of article repealing 64-year-olds
“They wanted a vote, they got it! Article 1 of the Liot bill is deleted by the Social Affairs Committee”, welcomed Jean-René Cazeneuve (Renaissance), the general rapporteur of Buget while rejecting the tabling of amendments from the Nupes.
In the Social Affairs Committee, the deputies voted for the deletion of the article repealing the retirement age at 64.
In the Social Affairs Committee, the deputies vote to delete the article repealing the retirement age at 64
The deputies of the Social Affairs Committee rejected article 1 of the Liot bill on the repeal of the pension reform.
38 elected officials voted for its rejection, 34 voted against.
This article wanted to come back to the decline in the starting age. It should be reintroduced in session on June 8 by the Liot deputies.
Repeal of the pension reform: the Nupes files dozens of amendments to prolong the debates
To try to prolong the debates in the Social Affairs Committee on the repeal of the pension reform, which on paper can last until June 5, the rebellious tabled dozens of amendments this Wednesday morning, passing their number from 89 to 430.
In full examination of the repeal of the pension reform, an LR deputy accuses Charles de Courson of being “the Che Guevara of the Marne”
Charles de Courson, the rapporteur of the bill on the repeal of the pension reform, is the subject of many spades in the Social Affairs Committee.
“You are transforming yourself into Che Guevara de la Marne”, scolded the elected LR Alexandre Vincendet after explaining that this pillar of the National Assembly for 30 years “had given him a taste for politics”.
For the president of the Social Affairs Committee, the macronie “has no lesson in democracy to receive from the Nupes”
The president of the Social Affairs Committee has repeatedly expressed her annoyance since the start of the committee’s examination of the text on the repeal of the pension reform.
“We have no lesson in democracy to receive from the Nupes”, launched Fadila Khattabi (Renaissance), after the numerous speeches of rebellious elected officials who defended this bill, worrying about a possible “obstruction”.
Repeal of the pension reform: in committee, Mathilde Panot denounces “the mafia drift” of macronie
In an electric atmosphere in the Social Affairs Committee, Mathilde Panot regretted “the mafia drift” of macronie, accusing her of playing “parliamentary lotto”, with “49.3., 44.3” and “now article 40” .
We tell you here why article 40 is the object of all eyes.
Pension reform: “Charles de Courson got lost”, says Sarah El Haïry
For Sarah El Haïry, “Charles de Courson got lost”. “I no longer recognize his words when he was a man of reason,” added the Secretary of State for Youth this Wednesday morning on Europe 1.
The deputy, pillar of the Liot group, is the rapporteur for the text which defends the repeal of the pension reform.
Find here the portrait of the one that some call “the monk of public finances”.
For Éric Woerth, the repeal of the pension reform puts “democracy in danger”
“Democracy is in danger”, annoys Éric Woerth this Wednesday morning on Sud radio after Éric Coquerel’s decision to deem admissible the bill on the repeal of the pension reform.
We explain to you here why the constitutionalists are divided on the admissibility of this text.
Repeal of the pension reform: Sandrine Rousseau accuses Macronie of “scheming”
Sandrine Rousseau denounced “the shenanigans” of the presidential majority a few minutes before the start of the Social Affairs Committee which is considering the future of the bill to repeal the retirement age at 64.
MEPs discuss in committee the future of the repeal of the pension reform
The Social Affairs Committee which meets this Wednesday morning to examine the Liot bill on the repeal of the pension reform begins in an electric atmosphere.
Proof of the stake: a large majority of the LFI group is present to attend the debates and has requested a new, larger room to accommodate them.
Éric Coquerel, the rebellious chairman of the Finance Committee, ruled this text admissible on Tuesday.
If you haven’t followed anything, we summarize the different scenarios on the table at the end of this meeting here.
Coquerel judges that “macronie has a problem vis-à-vis parliamentary democracy”
Éric Coquerel strikes back. Accused by the presidential camp of having taken a “political” decision, after declaring the Liot text on pensions admissible, the rebellious believes on BFMTV-RMC that “Macrony has a problem vis-à-vis parliamentary democracy “.
“As a minority, she will look in the regulations, the laws – sometimes at the limit of legality – which allows her to pass texts without a vote”, judges the president of the finance committee.
Repeal of the pension reform: for Coquerel, “the desire to try to censor the bill is political”
Guest of BFMTV-RMC, Éric Coquerel denounces a “political and partisan will of the members of the majority” to “censor” the Liot bill. The text consists in particular in repealing the postponement of the legal age of departure, provided for by the pension reform.
For him, the presidential camp “decided” to “seize” him under article 40 on this text in his capacity as chairman of the finance committee, “so that this text does not reach the Assembly” , because they “know they are in the minority”.
Liot text declared admissible: Coquerel defends a decision taken “in the name of jurisprudence”
This Tuesday, Éric Coquerel declared admissible the Liot bill, consisting in repealing the postponement of the legal age of departure, provided for by the pension reform. The draft evader had been seized in his capacity as chairman of the finance committee under article 40.
This provision specifies that any bill which presents a new financial burden for the State must be financially compensated.
“This law was guaranteed”, defends Éric Coquerel on BFMTV-RMC, also explaining his decision in the name of “the jurisprudence of the parliamentary initiative”.
Repeal of the pension reform: Marleix judges that Coquerel took “a somewhat political decision”
This Tuesday, Éric Coquerel declared admissible the Liot bill, consisting in repealing the postponement of the legal age of departure, provided for by the pension reform. The draft evader had been seized in his capacity as chairman of the finance committee under article 40.
This provision specifies that any bill which presents a new financial burden for the State must be financially compensated.
On Public Sénat, Olivier Marleix believes that Éric Coquerel took a “slightly political decision”. “Article 40 of the Constitution is very clear”, underlines the boss of the Republican deputies. While acknowledging nevertheless that it is customary to be “more flexible on the PPL (proposed law) than on the amendments which [créent] a load”.
Text on the repeal of the pension reform: for Olivier Marleix, “it’s a blow for nothing”
“A blow for nothing”. This is how Olivier Marleix judges the Liot bill consisting in particular in repealing the postponement of the legal age to 64, provided for by the pension reform.
“All of this will come to nothing,” said the boss of the Republican (LR) deputies.
“Everyone knows that this text could not be adopted in the Senate”, the majority of which is in favor of pension reform, argues the deputy for Eure-et-Loir.
“Make the French believe that it could lead to something, it does not help much,” he still believes.
The boss of the Liot group evokes “the hypothesis” of a motion of censure if “the rights of the opposition are flouted”
They are ready to think about “all the alternatives”. Guest of Public Senate, the president of the group Liot Bertrand Pancher indicated that a motion of censure is a “hypothesis” if “the rights of the opposition are violated”, just like the fact of “no longer sitting” at the National Assembly.
In question: the text defended by his troops, which consists in particular in repealing the postponement of the legal retirement age. Fearing a major setback, the Macronists do everything to prevent his vote, and line up behind article 40 of the Constitutionaccording to which parliamentarians cannot propose measures creating an unfunded expenditure.
>> Our article
Is the bill to repeal the pension reform really inadmissible?
The oppositions and the majority oppose on the question of the admissibility of the text to reconsider the retirement at 64 years. If constitutionalists judge that on paper, it contravenes the respect of an article of the Constitution, others point to the respect of the parliamentary initiative.
>> Our article
An LR deputy who voted for censorship replaced a few hours before the decisive vote in committee
A few hours before a decisive vote on the Liot bill, Justine Gruet, deputy Les Républicains who had voted for the motion of censure against the Borne government, is replaced by Veronique Louwagie.
The balance of power therefore evolves slightly in favor of the presidential camp because Thibault Bazin, who had not voted for censorship, is replaced by Anne-Laure Blin. This LR deputy from Maine-et-Loire had not voted for the motion of censure either in March.
According to our estimates, if all the parliamentarians of the Social Affairs Committee are present, 34 (including 2 Republicans) could therefore vote against the deletion of the article repealing the postponement of the legal age, and 38 (including the 6 LRs) could vote for.
Hello everyone!
Welcome to this direct dedicated to monitoring the news related to the pension reform this Wednesday, May 31, and more particularly to the debate on the Liot bill this Wednesday morning in the Social Affairs Committee of the National Assembly.