House ban – opinion – SZ.de

While the public prosecutor’s office in Hanover now has the honorable task of pondering a legal assessment of the fact that the ballet director of the local state opera, Marco Goecke, smeared the FAZ theater critic Wiebke Hüster with the feces of his dachshund Gustav, the punishment is already following elsewhere Foot. Specifically: The opera has given the ballet director a house ban. Short and sweet. This means that the perpetrator is not allowed to return to the crime scene in the opera foyer “until further notice”. He is also not wanted in the rest of the building for the time being. If he comes anyway, the opera could file a criminal complaint for trespassing, Section 123 of the Criminal Code; A fine or up to a year in prison are possible. Interestingly, the ballet director Goecke had accused the FAZ critic before his attack of being responsible for canceling subscriptions – and in turn threatened her with being banned from the house. An empty threat, as it now shows. Because obviously the ballet director did not have this domiciliary right – that is, the right to determine the use of a room or a house – as he can now impressively experience himself. Incidentally, a house ban can be pronounced at will, you don’t have to have misbehaved for it.

source site