Under 14, over 14, over 35, over 50, 3G, 4G? Who should look through the constantly changing requirements and limit values?
The pandemic has made life a lot less safe for everyone. It is true that we now know more and more about the virus as such. That helps and gives a little firmer ground under your feet. However, other sources of uncertainty and confusion remain. Unfortunately, these are precisely the institutions from which one expects reliability, namely politics and administration.
It seems that those who set the corona rules have lost touch with reality. Constantly new regulations on infection control measures and their updates cloud the brain of anyone who tries to obey them.
Anyone who wants to know what is currently valid is almost dependent on a crash course in law. How else are you supposed to look through the growing labyrinth of paragraphs, sentences and numbers? So it’s not surprising that more and more people don’t give a damn about the rules.
When you’ve finally made it, you’ll be faced with new puzzles. An example: The 3G rule has been in effect in Munich since this Monday. Pupils from the age of six do not have to prove whether they have been vaccinated, recovered or tested in order to go to the cinema. The reason: they are regularly tested as part of school lessons.
Now the incidence value in Munich is over 50 for three days in a row, so new rules will come into force on Thursday. Anyone who has not been vaccinated, has recovered or is under 14 years of age is only allowed to meet a maximum of ten people from three households. Understood? But what do all students from 14 years of age who are no longer exempt from the certificate do? How did these young people of all people deserve stricter rules? Why is there not the same exception here as for the 3G rule?
Under 14, over 14, over 35, over 50, 3G, or what? This confusion with announcement must come to an end. Before announcing the next rules, be it 4G or 10G, please first think about whether everything really fits together.