Contrary to Schwesig’s plans: Ex-Prime Minister Sellering wants to continue with the Climate Foundation Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania

Germany Contrary to Schwesig’s plans

Ex-Prime Minister Sellering wants to continue the Climate Foundation Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania

“A very heavy blow for Manuela Schwesig”

“So your plan to get the mess out of the world failed,” says Matthias Kamann, WELT editor for domestic politics, on the legal opinion of the Nord Stream Foundation. If this legal position prevails, then this foundation will continue to exist.

You can listen to our WELT podcasts here

In order to display embedded content, your revocable consent to the transmission and processing of personal data is required, since the providers of the embedded content as third-party providers require this consent [In diesem Zusammenhang können auch Nutzungsprofile (u.a. auf Basis von Cookie-IDs) gebildet und angereichert werden, auch außerhalb des EWR]. By setting the switch to “on”, you agree to this (which can be revoked at any time). This also includes your consent to the transfer of certain personal data to third countries, including the USA, in accordance with Art. 49 (1) (a) GDPR. You can find more information about this. You can withdraw your consent at any time via the switch and via privacy at the bottom of the page.

Dissolving the Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania climate protection foundation, which was much criticized in connection with Nord Stream 2, cannot be implemented for legal reasons, says former Prime Minister Erwin Sellering. This increases the pressure on his party friend and successor Manuela Schwesig.

EContrary to the express will of the state parliament and state government, the former head of government Erwin Sellering (SPD) wants to continue the controversial climate protection foundation Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania. The required dissolution is not possible under foundation law and for reasons of liability. The legal situation is clear. “For us as a foundation, a dissolution is off the table,” emphasized Sellering on Friday in Schwerin, referring to a report commissioned by the foundation’s board of directors from the Bochum legal scholar Katharina Uffmann.

The state foundation, which was founded in early 2021 and has since been managed by Sellering, has been heavily criticized. In addition to the public interest-oriented area of ​​climate protection, it also included an economic area that helped the Russian state-owned company Gazprom to complete the construction of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline through the Baltic Sea, circumventing US sanctions. The line was completed in autumn 2021. The economic area is in liquidation, said Sellering. However, it is important to continue the work on climate protection. This is the “most important task of the century,” said Sellering.

Documents that have become public show that representatives of the Gazprom subsidiary Nord Stream had a direct influence on the drafting of the foundation’s statutes. Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania’s Prime Minister Manuela Schwesig (SPD) had admitted that there were talks, but rejected reports that Nord Stream 2 AG had been in charge of founding the foundation. The foundation’s biggest donor was Nord Stream 2 with 20 million euros. It is unclear how much of this will remain after a possible tax levy. According to Sellering, an examination is being carried out to determine whether the foundation is exempt from gift tax. The country itself gave 200,000 euros to the foundation.

also read

support against Russia

After the start of the Russian war of aggression in Ukraine, the German government stopped the commissioning of the Russian-German gas pipeline. Schwesig also distanced herself from the project she had always supported before. She is also personally criticized for her pro-Russia course for a long time. The CDU foreign policy expert Norbert Röttgen had suggested Schwesig’s resignation because of her connections with Russia, which the Prime Minister, however, rejected. Sellering described the allegations against Schwesig as irrelevant, unjustified and sometimes disgusting.

source site