Annalena Baerbock considers the FDP paper to be problematic given the world situation

0

Germany Plan for “economic turnaround”

Baerbock considers the FDP paper to be problematic given the world situation

| Reading time: 3 minutes

“Then the FDP is making a huge mistake” – SPD rejects proposals for social cuts

The FDP presidium is discussing a twelve-point paper on economic recovery. In addition to stricter rules for social benefits, it includes, among other things, the abolition of pensions at 63. The SPD rejects the proposals. Lars Klingbeil calls it an attack on the “true top performers”.

You can listen to our WELT podcasts here

In order to display embedded content, your revocable consent to the transmission and processing of personal data is necessary, as the providers of the embedded content require this consent as third party providers [In diesem Zusammenhang können auch Nutzungsprofile (u.a. auf Basis von Cookie-IDs) gebildet und angereichert werden, auch außerhalb des EWR]. By setting the switch to “on”, you agree to this (revocable at any time). This also includes your consent to the transfer of certain personal data to third countries, including the USA, in accordance with Art. 49 (1) (a) GDPR. You can find more information about this. You can revoke your consent at any time using the switch and privacy at the bottom of the page.

Dispute in the traffic light coalition: A 12-point plan from the FDP envisages stricter rules for citizens’ benefits and an abolition of pensions at 63. The Social Democrats react indignantly, Foreign Minister Baerbock comments negatively on the paper.

Aforeign minister Annalena Baerbock considers the FDP’s proposals for stricter rules for citizens’ benefits and the end of pensions at 63 to be problematic given the current world situation. “We see that this turbulent world situation is a major challenge, especially for democracies, because autocracies are specifically using the current, volatile situations to destabilize democracies,” said the Green politician on Monday when asked what she thought of it The FDP leaders believe the concept is for an economic turnaround. “That is why, especially in moments like this, especially before the European elections, unity is needed between (…) all democratic actors in our societies.”

On Monday, the FDP Presidium adopted a 12-point paper “to accelerate the economic turnaround”. It is expected to be decided at the federal Liberal party conference this weekend. The points include the abolition of the pension at the age of 63, tax advantages for working overtime and a reduction in bureaucracy on several levels, including in the construction sector. Baerbock did not comment on the content of the paper.

The proposals became known at the weekend – the paper had already caused a dispute in the traffic light coalition. The SPD politicians Lars Klingbeil and Kevin Kühnert reacted with sharp criticism to possible cuts in social policy.

SPD is outraged by FDP paper

“It is right that we have to do something to stimulate the economy, secure jobs here in the country and create new ones,” said SPD leader Klingbeil to “Bild am Sonntag”. “But if the FDP believes that the economy is doing better when craftsmen, nurses or educators are doing worse, then they are seriously mistaken.”

also read

Gerhard Schröder & Gregor Gysi

Klingbeil’s party friend, SPD General Secretary Kühnert, also sharply rejected the FDP’s proposals. “Now the cat is out of the bag: Christian Lindner’s economic transition concept consists primarily of insulting employees,” he told the “Tagesspiegel”. “The SPD will not allow our country to be run with the sensitivity of investment bankers. The basis of the traffic light coalition is and remains the coalition agreement,” Kühnert continued.

The SPD member of the Bundestag and social expert Helge Lindh (SPD) told the “Bild”: “If the FDP were serious about this – that is, if it intended to implement it now – then the paper reads like a declaration of withdrawal from the coalition.”

Söder: “Divorce certificate for the traffic light”

In the Union, top politicians see the paper as a possible end for the traffic light coalition. “This is nothing more than a divorce certificate for the traffic lights!” said the Bavarian Prime Minister and CSU leader Markus Söder to “Bild am Sonntag”.

CDU General Secretary Carsten Linnemann explained: “The paper reads like ‘Lambsdorff 2.0’.” He was alluding to the concept of the then Economics Minister Otto Graf Lambsdorff (FDP) in the social-liberal coalition under Chancellor Helmut Schmidt (SPD). The paper from 1982 made a number of suggestions for “overcoming weak growth and combating unemployment” – and has gone down in history as the “divorce letter”. A few days later, on October 1, 1982, Helmut Kohl (CDU) was elected as the new Federal Chancellor with a constructive vote of no confidence.

Here you will find content from third parties

In order to display embedded content, your revocable consent to the transmission and processing of personal data is necessary, as the providers of the embedded content require this consent as third party providers [In diesem Zusammenhang können auch Nutzungsprofile (u.a. auf Basis von Cookie-IDs) gebildet und angereichert werden, auch außerhalb des EWR]. By setting the switch to “on”, you agree to this (revocable at any time). This also includes your consent to the transfer of certain personal data to third countries, including the USA, in accordance with Art. 49 (1) (a) GDPR. You can find more information about this. You can revoke your consent at any time using the switch and privacy at the bottom of the page.

Linnemann demanded: “The FDP has to be honest. Either she gets out of the traffic lights or she enforces some necessary measures. There are a few points in there that could be quickly implemented under black/yellow.”

source site