Abortion Law in the Supreme Court: Feelings Outside, Arguments Inside

The US Supreme Court has begun its hearing on the Mississippi Abortion Act, accompanied by protests. The court’s decision could have far-reaching consequences – but it will probably not be made until mid-2022.

“Shame on yourselves, you wicked women,” this anti-abortion opponent shouts into his megaphone in front of the steps of the Supreme Court. He is flanked by two black-clad men with sunglasses. They hold up life-size signs. “Abortion is murder” is written on one. Another shows a baby in a pool of blood.

Hundreds of anti-abortion opponents are protesting in front of the Supreme Court. Buses drove up to entire parishes, religious school and student groups. Like him: a seventeen year old in a suit and tie. Abortion is a child sacrifice to the devil, he says. He’d rather not give his name.

Criticism of sheer minority

Actually, the pro-life movement against abortion is a minority. About 60 percent of Americans are in favor of legal abortions. But: the minority is loud. And better organized that day.

Proponents of abortion law can hardly do anything against the angry speeches. “We will be loud, uncompromising, we will fight abortions free,” shouts this activist, surrounded by women who want them to continue to be able to decide freely about their bodies.

Nine judges before an important decision

Inside, in the courtroom, fewer feelings – more arguments. The nine judges question both sides. And judge Sonia Sotomayor suggests that she does not believe that Roe is now being challenged against Wade. For decades, Americans – including the judges of the “Supreme Court” – have repeatedly spoken out in favor of the fundamental ruling that allows abortions up to the 24th week of pregnancy.

“15 judges said yes, from different political directions. Will this court survive the stink that it would create in the public perception if it became clear that the Constitution and its interpretation are just a political act?”

Not a political act, finds Scott Stewart – more democracy as it should be. He is representing the plaintiff in this case, the state of Mississippi. And he wants to know from the court: Is it really unconstitutional for states to decide on abortion bans themselves? “Abortion is a difficult subject. It demands the best of all of us – not just a judgment from the few. If an issue concerns everyone, and if the constitution does not give a clear position on it, then this issue belongs to the citizens.”

Decision expected in June

Only some citizens worry that in the end the anti-abortionists will be more powerful. This is what this woman says, who protests outside the Supreme Court: “The minorities rule,” she says. They preferred the electoral law reforms and redrawing of constituencies. That is unfair – towards them – the majority.

Four of the six conservative judges seem ready to tip Roe versus Wade after the first day of the trial. If this actually happens, then at least twelve states would then directly ban abortion. A decision is expected to be made in June next year.