Moscow has intensified its efforts to influence the upcoming U.S. presidential election on November 5, utilizing a network of pro-Russian operatives to disseminate misinformation. Tactics included deceptive videos undermining candidates and questioning electoral integrity. Despite increased online activity and attempts to leverage influential figures, the overall impact of Russian interference has been limited, overshadowed by more prevalent narratives within American political discourse. Security warnings were issued, yet the effectiveness of these operations remains questionable.
Russian Interference in the 2023 U.S. Elections
This year, Moscow has made significant attempts to influence major elections globally, including the United States. A large network of pro-Russian operatives has made several attempts to manipulate online opinions and meddle in the presidential election scheduled for Tuesday, November 5. With the election fast approaching, the FBI issued a warning regarding the ‘threat’ posed by Russian interference operations. But what evidence exists, and what impact have these actions had? We’ve investigated further.
Manipulation Tactics: Videos and Influencer Funding
The initial signs of Russian interference in the U.S. elections emerged early in the campaign. The objective appeared to be undermining the Democratic ticket’s credibility. A deceptive video, which garnered over 5.3 million views on X before its removal, falsely alleged that Kamala Harris had been involved in a fatal car accident. Additionally, her running mate faced unsubstantiated claims of sexual assault.
In both instances, links to Russia were evident. The site responsible for disseminating this fake news was registered by John Mark Dougan, a former Florida police officer who relocated to Moscow and became the leader of a sprawling pro-Russian disinformation network. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) noted that multiple indicators suggest the rumor regarding Tim Walz is part of the influence tactics employed by Russian actors.
Later, a new strategy emerged: questioning the reliability of the electoral process itself. A video depicted an individual vandalizing mail-in ballots supporting Donald Trump. Authorities in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, debunked this fabricated footage within hours, stating it had been ‘fabricated and amplified’ by a pro-Russian network. Bret Schafer, a disinformation researcher, pointed out that Russia’s focus has shifted from influencing election outcomes to eroding American trust in the election results.
The spread of false information was further amplified by a network known as ‘Storm-1516,’ an extension of the notorious Russian troll factory identified in 2016. According to an investigation by Clemson University’s Media Forensics Hub, this group disseminated at least 54 distinct pieces of misinformation over the year, with ten specifically targeting the election.
As the election date neared, online activity surged, peaking on November 1, when around twenty misleading videos related to the presidential election were released almost simultaneously. One such clip, which falsely claimed that the FBI had arrested individuals involved in election rigging, was quickly denounced as ‘inauthentic’ by the FBI.
Despite the volume of misleading content, Russian actors struggled to gain traction on social media. Their posts often went unnoticed, lacking significant followers or credible references. To enhance visibility, they attempted to leverage existing influential accounts. A video featuring a man allegedly traveling from Haiti to vote for Kamala Harris garnered significant attention due to its association with ‘AlphaFox78,’ a popular far-right user known for supporting Donald Trump. He later confessed to being compensated for sharing the video, with Russian propagandist Simeon Boikov, known as ‘AussieCossack,’ reportedly offering him $100 for the post.
This election cycle has seen a novel approach from Russia, aligning its actions with the narratives of American extremist figures who hold considerable sway in the country. Some influencers, such as Tim Pool and David Rubin, received funding from Tenet Media, a company purportedly connected to Russian agents, as reported by the U.S. Department of Justice. Collectively, these influencers boast an audience of six million subscribers on YouTube.
Limited Impact of Russian Efforts
The multitude of attempts linked to Russian actors prompted security services to issue warnings about potential election day interference. On the election day itself, threats were reported at various polling locations, with authorities indicating that these originated from Russian email domains. While the FBI assessed that none of these threats were credible, the situation remains under investigation.
Similar to the bomb threats, Russia’s operations failed to captivate an audience. Most videos struggled to surpass hundreds of thousands of views and were quickly overshadowed by the more viral misinformation generated by the MAGA sphere. Some of these narratives received tens of millions of views, aided significantly by Elon Musk’s involvement in promoting Trump’s campaign through his social media platform. This internal strategy proved far more effective than the attempts originating from Moscow.
If you have any inquiries or wish to report potentially unreliable information, please reach out to us at [email protected]. You can also follow our team on Twitter at @verif_TF1LCI.