Trump Takes a Stand at the Southern Border: His Perspective on the Battle Against Invasion

Donald Trump has reintroduced stringent immigration policies, including declaring a national emergency at the southern border, reinstating the “Remain in Mexico” policy, and suspending refugee admissions. He aims to classify foreign drug cartels as terrorist organizations and leverage the Alien Enemies Act for expedited deportations. Civil rights groups plan to challenge changes to citizenship laws for U.S.-born children of undocumented immigrants. Despite public support, questions remain about the feasibility and legality of his proposed measures amidst rising immigration challenges.

Trump’s Stricter Immigration Policies: A New Era Begins

One of the most significant promises made by Donald Trump during his campaign was to implement a tougher immigration policy. He made bold claims about initiating “the most extensive mass deportations in American history.” Following his inauguration, Trump wasted no time in putting his plans into action. On his very first day in office, he signed nearly 100 executive orders, many of which focused on immigration reform.

National Emergency at the Southern Border

In a dramatic move, Trump declared a national emergency along the southern border with Mexico. This declaration enables him to deploy military forces to the border and allocate defense funds to construct additional border walls. Furthermore, Trump aims to classify certain foreign drug cartels, known for their involvement in human trafficking at the border, as terrorist organizations. The potential repercussions of this classification are still uncertain. However, Mexico has expressed concerns that the U.S. might take military action against these cartels within its territory. Notably, Trump previously suggested the use of military force against drug labs in Mexico, indicating a possible escalation in tactics.

Continuing his tough stance, Trump is reinstating policies from his first term, such as the “Remain in Mexico” policy. This mandates that asylum seekers wait in Mexico for their immigration hearings, a practice criticized by human rights organizations due to the dangers posed by drug cartels in the region. Additionally, the administration has halted the operation of an app that previously allowed migrants in Mexico to schedule interviews with U.S. immigration officials.

In a departure from his earlier policies, Trump has indefinitely suspended the refugee admission program, stating it would remain closed until it aligns with U.S. interests. To combat foreign criminal gangs like Venezuela’s Tren de Aragua, he plans to invoke the Alien Enemies Act from 1798, which allows for the arrest and deportation of citizens from hostile nations. By branding the immigration situation at the southern border as an “invasion,” Trump may try to leverage this law to expedite deportations, although legal experts doubt the courts will support this interpretation.

Trump’s declaration also aims to suspend asylum rights, citing the federal government’s responsibility to defend against “invasion.” His order includes a suspension of physical entry for foreigners at the southern border until he deems the situation resolved. This could conflict with existing constitutional rights that allow refugees to apply for asylum upon entering U.S. territory.

In response to Trump’s initiatives, civil rights organizations and several Democratic attorneys general have announced plans to challenge his decree that aims to eliminate automatic citizenship for children born in the U.S. This policy change would deny citizenship to children born to undocumented or temporarily legal immigrants. Anthony Romero, director of the American Civil Liberties Union, labeled this move unconstitutional and contrary to America’s foundational values.

As Trump seeks to curb immigration from the southern border, he has committed to a large-scale deportation campaign targeting “millions of criminal aliens.” While he has suggested employing military resources for these deportations, the Posse Comitatus Act prohibits military enforcement of domestic laws. Furthermore, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency lacks the necessary manpower and funds for mass deportations, especially as many police forces in Democratic-led cities refuse cooperation with ICE.

Last year, ICE deported 271,000 individuals, the highest figure during Trump’s presidency. Despite record immigration levels under Biden, the number of undocumented immigrants in the U.S. is estimated to exceed 10 million, with nearly 6 million awaiting residency or asylum decisions. Deporting these individuals could cost the U.S. hundreds of billions and create significant labor shortages across various sectors.

Interestingly, some Democrats are beginning to reconsider their stance on immigration. Trump has appointed Tom Homan as the “Border Czar,” tasked with overseeing deportations. Homan has indicated that initial operations will focus on detaining individuals deemed security risks, but these numbers are unlikely to reach the millions Trump has suggested. Currently, ICE has around 650,000 individuals with criminal records listed in its databases.

Public opinion appears to favor Trump’s measures as the election results indicate. However, the effectiveness of these policies as a deterrent remains to be seen. Just before Trump’s inauguration, approximately 2,000 migrants set out from southern Mexico towards the U.S. border. The possibility of achieving a bipartisan immigration reform seems uncertain, particularly as Biden has tightened migration policies, resulting in an uptick in illegal border crossings, reminiscent of Trump’s first term.

As a response to recent events, some Democratic lawmakers appear open to a more stringent immigration approach. On Monday, 12 Democratic senators supported the Laken Riley Act, named after a student tragically killed by an undocumented immigrant. This proposal seeks to authorize the arrest of undocumented individuals based on even minor offenses.

Related Articles