Time change: Why the EU can’t agree on an end

Winter time vs. summer time
That is why the EU states cannot agree on the end of the time change

Is the time correct again for you? It’s that late in Germany now.

© Christoph Soeder / DPA

Last night the clock was turned again (is it already working correctly with you?). Former Commissioner Jean-Claude Juncker announced in 2019 that the time change would be abolished by 2021. Why is nothing going on there?

The groundhog greets every six months: On the night of Sunday (October 31st) the time has been set back an hour – then normal time (also known as winter time) applies again. On Sunday the sun sets in western Germany around 5.10 p.m., and in the east even a good half an hour earlier. The ritual in the European Union should actually be history. But a quick end is not in sight.

So why does the time change still exist? A spokesman for the EU Commission recently put it this way: “This question about the seasonal time change is also a seasonal question that we receive twice a year before the time change.” Like six months before, he could only repeat what he repeated six months ago: “The ball is now in the field of the member states.”

In 2018, the EU Commission asked citizens about the topic. 84 percent were in the non-representative consultation for an end to the change between summer and winter time. Approval was particularly high in Germany.

Winter or summer time?

In the same year, the then commission head Jean-Claude Juncker announced an end to the time change on German breakfast television: “People want this, we do it,” he said. The EU Parliament then approved the subsequent proposal of the EU Commission in March 2019 and spoke out in favor of abolishing the time change in 2021. But they still exist.

Because there is a problem with the EU countries: They would have to clarify whether they want permanent summer or winter time. So far, however, the governments in the Council of the EU have not found a common position. And apparently no longer looking for them: Slovenia currently holds the presidency of the EU states, a spokeswoman said there was “nothing new” about the time change. There has been no debate on this since July under the Slovenian Council Presidency.

The problem is not just in the EU countries

The CSU MEP Markus Ferber criticizes the fact that the EU countries did not make serious efforts to advance the project. “The discussion among the member states has not even started.” Most recently, Lithuania’s transport minister, Marius Skuodis, also called for a solution.

When asked whether the EU Commission would propose the plan of its former boss again, a spokesman emphasized that it was important to listen to the opinion of the population. Even if – as in this case – problems are not always easy to solve. “The time actually goes very slowly when it comes to the time change,” said the spokesman.

One problem is, among other things, that there is a risk of a patchwork quilt: If the countries do not agree on summer or winter time, it could come to that. If this does not succeed, there could be problems with timetables and in other areas. In addition, the effects for EU countries on the fringes of the Central European time zone are not positive: If the permanent summer time were to come, it would mean darkness for Spain in winter until shortly before 10 a.m. If everyone agrees on wintertime, it would be light in Warsaw by 3 a.m. in summer. The time change twice a year dampens these extremes.

cl
DPA

source site