Justice confirms the responsibility of the German certifier

The Court of Cassation confirmed on Thursday the responsibility of the German certifier TÜV in the case of defective PIP breast prostheses, which affected thousands of women around the world, while referring several aspects of the case to the Lyon Court of Appeal.

Seizure of four decisions on the compensation of victims of this health scandal, the highest court of the French judicial order confirmed in particular that “the company TÜV Rheinland (…) failed in its obligations of control, prudence and vigilance in the exercise of its professional mission, (and) that the professional responsibility of the company TÜV Rheinland France is proven”.

The Court was seized of decisions rendered by the courts of appeal of Aix-en-Provence (Bouches-du-Rhône), Paris and Versailles on the compensation of victims of this health scandal which had broken out in 2010.

Some of the cases will be retried in Lyon

Thousands of women around the world had received implants filled with non-compliant, homemade and cheap gel, instead of the required silicone gel, following a fraud by this PIP company based in the Var. It therefore confirmed TUV’s liability and quashed for the rest two decisions rendered in Aix, on a point of law (the Court of Cassation does not judge on the merits of the cases).

In another part of the case, which has become sprawling over the years, it confirmed a decision by the Paris Court of Appeals holding TÜV liable and ordering the company to pay a provision for moral damage and anxiety. It ruled that this liability could not be limited to a period from September 1, 2006 to April 6, 2010, contrary to what had been decided by the Paris Court of Appeal. This limitation had led to the dismissal of several hundred plaintiffs of their claims for compensation.

The Court of Cassation has finally overturned a judgment of the Versailles Court of Appeal rejecting the compensation claims of more than 200 women, domiciled in Sweden. She returned all the files, for the broken parts and therefore to be re-tried, to the Lyon Court of Appeal.

source site