Judged for “the firecracker affair”, Jean Alesi recognizes “idiocy” and released

A wet firecracker. Jean Alesi was released by the criminal court of Nîmes, this Thursday. The reason for his presence at this hearing? A “idiocy” that he admitted to the hearing, namely having blown up the window of his ex-brother-in-law’s office with a big firecracker.

The former Ferrari driver, 58, and his son Guiliano, 23, had been sent to court “for damage to the property of others by a means dangerous to people, acts committed in the context of a conflict family”. These took place on December 19, 2021 in the town of Villeneuve-lès-Avignon, in the Gard, where the ex-Formula 1 driver has a house.

No dispute with the ex-companion of his sister

The police had been called around 10:00 p.m. by the neighborhood, worried by the sound of an explosion. Thanks to the plate number noted by a neighbor, the police were able to determine that the vehicle seen on the spot before driving away with all lights off belonged to José Alesi, the brother of the ex-pilot.

The former Scuderia driver (1991-1995) went to the police station the next day, where he cleared his brother, explaining that it was he who was in the car, with his son and a friend. of this one, and that he himself had “stuck a ‘big firework display bought in Italy’ in the frame of a window of his brother-in-law’s architectural office”.

On Thursday, he again “totally” acknowledged the facts. “I apologize because I have never had such an embarrassing situation in my life. This is nonsense,” he said in court. “When it farted, I was extremely shocked at the power. The intention was to laugh “by making a joke to the former companion of his sister, he explained, assuring not to be in dispute with him.

“Absence of intentional element”

“There is a family tradition of blowing up the firecrackers when you are happy, and Jean Alesi was in immense joy that evening to find his son after months of separation” because of the Covid-19, pleaded his lawyer, Me Thibaut de Montbrial.

The prosecutor also considered that it was a “bad joke” and noted that Jean Alesi had compensated the victim for the costs incurred. In its judgment, the court noted “the absence of intentional element” to commit an offense and acquitted Jean Alesi and his son.

source site