“I don’t believe in the future where I will have a peaceful retirement”, sadden our readers

There is electricity in the air. The project to push back the legal retirement age, presented Tuesday by the government, arouses, unsurprisingly, strong reactions. Currently at 62 years old, this minimum age could be postponed to 64 years old, after 43 years of contributions. While the implementation of this reform will be gradual, all people born after June 1961 will be affected. The readers who responded to our call for testimonials are concerned about their rights.

“Before the reform, I had to have about seventeen years left to work. I am told today two more and especially without earning more, regrets Gaëtan, 46 years old. If I imagined extending the end of my career in the back of my mind, it was mainly to earn more in retirement. There, it will be for nothing. »

The reaction is all the more lively as the job is difficult. “I no longer have a very good spine. In 2002, I had an accident at work, relates Nathalie, 54, nurse in a hospital environment for thirty years. I stayed in the active category with a loss of salary to be able to retire earlier and, there, I was told to extend another three years. Frankly, I’m disgusted. »

“PAC” is also concerned about the effects of this reform on the employability of seniors. “Being a manager and having started contributing at 24, I left to work until I was 67. The question I ask myself is not necessarily about my physical abilities, but rather intellectual and my ability to adapt to new tools, he explains. I think that companies will have to support and train so as not to end up with a very large number of unemployed people aged 62 and over. »

“I don’t understand how I could work for thirty-four years like this”

Even if they are not the most affected – the transition to 43 annual compulsory contributions having already been planned since the Touraine reform of 2014 – the youngest also feel concerned and worried by the discourse around pensions. “I have been working in public works for four years,” says Erwan, 30. I don’t understand how I could work another thirty-four years like this. We are asked to work more, even though thousands of unemployed could increase the income of pension funds if they had work. »

Even before joining the labor market, some already feel overwhelmed. “I will not start working at the earliest until 2025, at the age of 30, explains Kévin, a 27-year-old student “with a winding course”. If I had to work another 42 years (taking away what I have already obtained), that would make me retire at full rate, theoretically, at 72 years old in the year 2067. “Added to this is a form pessimism and eco-anxiety: “I don’t believe in a future where I will have a peaceful retirement. Perhaps future reforms will make me retire earlier, but perhaps even later. And above all, who can still claim that in 2060, society and the world will still be stable? »

Want to demonstrate for the first time

Despite everything, some people do not say they are concerned. ” I’m not worried. I am 47 years old, two children, I have been working for twenty-five years and I find it normal that we work until 65 in France, claims Philippe. This is also a very common retirement age in comparable European countries in terms of quality of life. […] Work is the essential component of life. If he finds the reform “necessary” to “avoid leaving debts to [ses] children”, Hervé is more nuanced. According to him, “we must optimize the time savings account system to allow self-financed early departure”.

So, in the face of concern, some are ready to mobilize against this reform, even if it is not their habit. “For the first time in my life, I even plan to join strike movements to make my dissatisfaction heard,” continues Erwan. “I think I’m mobilizing against this reform, which also completely spares current retirees,” agrees Gaëtan. They are expected next Thursday: this is the day chosen by the unions for their first day of action.

source site