Curious negotiation in Ebersberg: Zinnober for a broken sweater – Ebersberg

When a relationship breaks up, the partners involved like to make the famous cut to end it and start a new chapter in life. A 21-year-old from the central district of Ebersberg also made such a cut – albeit in a very literal sense: he took a pair of scissors and cut the designer sweater of his partner’s former lover. However, this “cut” was not associated with a new start, but with a legal dispute in court. The person who owned the two-part piece of clothing filed a complaint against his rival – and so it was now up to the Ebersberg juvenile court judge Dieter Kaltbeitzer to bring clarity to this thoroughly confused relationship between the three young men.

The incident that the trial was about happened on New Year’s Eve a year ago. After a break in the relationship, the accused had just reunited with his ex-partner when he discovered the unknown piece of clothing in his apartment. “I had never seen the sweater before, so I assumed it belonged to someone else,” said the 21-year-old. And indeed, it turned out that during the break in the relationship, his partner had a dalliance with another man – whose sweater the now accused was holding in his hands. After a brief outburst of anger, the piece of clothing, which cost around 100 euros, was history. “I didn’t want someone’s sweater to replace me,” the young man said.

“The whole thing is a bit tricky,” says even the experienced judge

What the defendant didn’t realize when he was “cut” was that the owner would have liked his sweater back in one piece. “I got the sweater from friends for my birthday, so of course it has a personal value for me,” said the 21-year-old on the witness stand. After he had asked the accused to pay him compensation, but the latter did not contact him, he reported it to the police.

Meanwhile, judge Kaltbeitzer asked himself why the ex-boyfriend was in possession of the sweater at all. This, as its original owner explained, is because the two swapped clothes during their relationship phase in order to always have a memory of the other at hand. However, while the sweater owner assumed that it was just a mutual loan, the ex-boyfriend understood the deal more as a gift, as he testified in court.

Even the experienced juvenile judge found it difficult to keep track of things here: “The whole thing is a bit tricky,” said Kaltbeitzer. One could come here both to a conviction for damage to property, and to an acquittal for the accused. However, since even in the event of a verdict, the 21-year-old’s guilt should be classified as rather low, the chairman suggested that the proceedings be discontinued without any conditions and that the matter with the cut sweater be left alone.

source site