At the helm, Didier Raoult’s daughter recounts the “gratuitous hatred” of the “IHU sheriff” on Twitter

“It’s a suffering to live that, this kind of gratuitous hatred which no longer has any basis. It is relentlessness for relentlessness. We went into a delirium, a kind of IHU sheriff. No, it’s not funny. No, it doesn’t make me laugh. “At the helm of the Marseille Criminal Court, Magali Carcopino-Tusoli contains her anger, alongside her husband. Both are doctors with the Public Assistance of Marseille Hospitals (AP-HM). Behind them, Eric Chabrière stares at them. The biochemist is known to be a close collaborator of his father, Didier Raoult, when the latter was in charge of the IHU. This Friday morning, the professor appeared in court, accused by the Carcopino-Tusoli couple of being the author of defamatory and offensive tweets, via an anonymous account called the Professional.

“Magali, the ugly duckling of the family unmasked, can we read in one of his messages. In a family of bright oaks, there are bound to be acorns. “A wave of tweets from this same account claiming to be Eric Chabrière, which came after Magali Carcopino-Tusoli took a stand against hydroxychloroquine and for vaccination against the coronavirus, against the opinions of her father with whom she is cold.

“Are my tires going to be punctured? »

“The period was very difficult, continues Magali Carcopino-Tusoli. We have been insulted for several years by Mr. Chabrière directly, and by this Twitter account. “And to affirm:” We tried to broadcast my personal address. I live with a twinge in my heart every morning. Will my tires be punctured? Are we going to rip the plaque off my cabinet? We live like that, in this atmosphere, and Mr. Chabrière stirs it up. What I want is for us to stop this atmosphere. »

“These tweets are extremely difficult for my wife, for my children and myself, abounds Xavier Carcopino-Tusoli. In the medical community, I have dozens of colleagues who have been harassed in the same way by the same account. I don’t want the politics of fear to prevail. Me, I’m not afraid. It’s my responsibility not to let things like that go by, too serious. It’s my responsibility that people can stop hiding behind fake accounts. »

“I’m going there to shed light on the IHU”

Tweets of which Eric Chabrière denies being the author, victim according to him of an identity theft who would have trapped him. “It is unfortunately the fate of many people, launches the biochemist, clinging to the bar, arms outstretched. I see a lot of politicians who are parodied. Yes, I am active on Twitter. The IHU was attacked, harassed, defamed. I understood that it was not on the scientific level that we could answer. That’s why I went to Twitter. To correct the assertions, the denigrations that we had. I’m going there to give light to the IHU. It is a media that has an audience, which is listened to by politicians. »

Information difficult to verify in the context of a direct quote, especially since Twitter refuses to communicate the real identities of its users. “Disturbing clue: every time there is a tweet from Chabrière, there is a tweet at the same time from the Professional! », Notes the lawyer for the Carcopino-Tusoli spouses, Me Philippe Carlini. Facts which in no way constitute proof, according to Eric Chabrière’s lawyer. For Me Ludovic Heringuez, the basis of this complaint is that of an orchestrated plot against his client. “My client said to himself that Ms. Carcopino was clearly instrumentalised,” he says. We know the aversion of Monsieur Crémieux [le directeur de l’AP-HM] for Mr. Raoult. »

Family Account Settlement

“I find myself in an uncomfortable situation because, behind it, whether we like it or not, there is a family story, abounds Eric Chabrière. I would have preferred not to find myself in family stories that do not concern me. It pains me for my former boss who is someone I respect. »

“My client was harassed in the course of her duties, retorts Me Philippe Carlini. She never presented herself as the daughter of Professor Raoult, and this is certainly not a settling of family accounts. She just expressed her opinion as a doctor, as so many others have. She did so openly and not anonymously. She just said what she thought. »

Deliberate on March 10

And to regret: “But she was entitled to special treatment. She was attacked in her integrity as a woman, as a wife, as a mother, in the most abject way possible. Her husband was dragged through the mud with the stated desire to have them divorced. All this is not without repercussions for children. But the couple held on, despite this media hype maintained by the defenders of the IHU. »

In front of him, Magali Carcopino-Tusoli’s eyes mist up. Her hand encloses that of her husband. “Mr. Chabrière claims to defend a just cause, accuses Me Carlini. But in fact, he defends his ego, above all. He pretends to be the defender of the IHU, while he has done so much harm to it. With a few others, they have managed the feat of ridiculing one of France’s greatest prides, to the point of justifying criminal complaints on subjects as serious as fraud in experiments, harassment and deviant medical practices. The communication was deplorable and the verbal and written violence of the courageous anonymous supposedly defenders of the institution ruined the weight of the scientific word. It may be more serious than this story. Me Carlini is claiming 10,000 euros each in damages, while the defense pleads for release. Judgment will be delivered on March 10.

source site