AfD against “Tagesschau”: For and against – media

After the flood disaster in the summer, 75 bridges were damaged or destroyed in Rhineland-Palatinate alone daily News. The Bundestag approved flood aid amounting to 30 billion euros for the reconstruction of buildings and infrastructure. So far, so correct, but because of the report on the flood aid, the NDR now had to submit a declaration of cease and desist to the AfD parliamentary group.

the daily News has thus undertaken not to further assert that the AfD parliamentary group did not agree to the flood aid fund in the vote on September 7, 2021 in the German Bundestag.

“The 8 p.m. edition of the daily News September 7th was processed retrospectively, “explained the NDR. There it was initially said that all parliamentary groups, with the exception of the AfD, had approved the flood relief fund. The day after the broadcast, the AfD parliamentary group complained about it on its website, because in fact would this have “expressly voted for the flood relief”.

Editor-in-chief of ARD-aktuell continues to reject AfD criticism

Although the NDR took the sentence in question from the daily News has now cut out in the media library, the editor-in-chief of ARD-aktuell, Marcus Bornheim, rejects parts of the AfD’s criticism. The message in the daily News was not wrong, but could only give the “improper” impression that the AfD parliamentary group had voted against the establishment of the flood aid fund, “in fact, it voted unanimously in favor of it in the second reading.”

First editor-in-chief of “ARD-aktuell”, Marcus Bornheim.

(Photo: NDR / Nadine Rupp)

The vote in the Bundestag took place in several stages, so the truth lies in the middle of the dispute. The AfD had initially voted for the flood aid, but abstained in the third and last round, as it also adds itself. According to parliamentary group leader Alice Weidel, this happened because the vote on the flood aid “was scandalously mixed up with the Infection Protection Act”.

The omnibus procedure was the trigger for the complicated coordination relationships

The NDR adds that the AfD “in the context of a so-called omnibus procedure in the decision to set up a flood aid fund and an amendment to the Infection Protection Act in the 3rd reading largely abstained”. In the original message of the daily News I referred to the statement of the Bundestag Vice President Petra Pau, who summed up after the final vote in the Bundestag: “The bill is with the votes of the coalition, the FDP faction, the faction Die Linke and the faction Bündnis 90 / Die Grünen against Votes from two members of the AfD parliamentary group were accepted with the abstention of the other members of the AfD parliamentary group. “

The omnibus procedure, because of which the AfD ultimately abstained, meant that approval of the flood aid was not possible without approval of the amendment to the Infection Protection Act rejected by the parliamentary group, according to the AfD. This was also criticized by the FDP, which, however, voted for the draft law.

A contribution from the “fact finder” of the daily News, in which the AfD parliamentary group’s criticism of the reports from September 7th was initially described as “misleading”, has now been revised.

.
source site